Russia’s Four Friends

The four supporters are:

  • Belarus
  • Nicaragua
  • North-Korea
  • Syria


※ Title: Territorial integrity of Ukraine : defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly
※ Agenda: A/ES-11/2 5 Letter dated 28 February 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2014/136). UKRAINE–POLITICAL CONDITIONS
※ Resolution: A/RES/ES-11/4
※ Meeting record: A/ES-11/PV.14
※ Draft resolution: A/ES-11/L.5
※ Voting Summary: Yes: 143 | No: 5 | Abstentions: 35 | Non-Voting: 10 | Total voting membership: 193
※ Vote date: 2022-10-12
※ Source: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3990400

For comments: Twitter

&nbsp
2022-10-18

Празднование Брексита

What happened to proudbear.ru? Seemingly they had been silenced. But already in 2018 @Pr0ud_Bear had prepared the posters for the Brexit celebration. Use them. Russia always is helpful!


Vladimir celebrates


Thank you, Boris!


 

Here is the flag.

※ 3781 x 1981: https://t.co/reYaagnxPx
※ 3694 x 1894: https://t.co/FKugPcVHo0
※ 8000 x 4200: https://t.co/k8urgVxrPS
※ SVG: https://t.co/OwArojW42N (100MB) pic.twitter.com/2Rc7rU0yZM

— Snark Sesquicentennial (@Snark150) January 18, 2020

<

※ 3781 x 1981: https://t.co/bzTW3LGAjC
※ 3694 x 1894: https://t.co/OGisfUrglI
※ 8000 x 4200: https://t.co/DJ20xdPKhJ
※ SVG: https://t.co/7TQ5CRpoYc pic.twitter.com/04H5Mm1r5M

— Götz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) January 18, 2020

Mueller Didn’t Clear Trump

Breaking News: Robert Mueller wrote a letter to the attorney general objecting to his characterization that the Russia inquiry appeared to clear President Trump https://t.co/sApMAxyIhX

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2019

The letter adds to the growing evidence of a rift between them and is another sign of the anger among the special counsel’s investigators about Barr’s characterization of their findingshttps://t.co/hl9MFjGPCp

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2019

 more
 

Among Trump’s caddies:

Here’s a link describing Barr’s employment & investment ties to Russia. As such, Barr should recuse himself as Attorney General. I really believes Robert Mueller should be interviewed ASAP. Impeachment would make doing this a heck of a lot easier!https://t.co/ofeMIOSU2i. (2/2)😒

— RenéeLaChatte (@renfibax) May 1, 2019

 more

Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election

The game goes on.https://t.co/NmLZ9O2FXY

Graphics: https://t.co/SouyUs1txOpic.twitter.com/SiWv35iOQD

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) April 20, 2019


 

The report is very interesting. It helps to understand what kind of person the US citizens voted into office.https://t.co/vO8v3kz3k6

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) April 20, 2019

 more
 

https://t.co/8BCTOnrD3p

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) April 20, 2019

Haunted by Kremlins

Reporting establishes that Trump's campaign manager sold a known Kremlin spy proprietary internal campaign polling data and an offer of private briefings on Trump's foreign policy deliberations for $2.4 million. We'll see what Mueller found—but it certainly wasn't "no collusion."

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

1/ For instance, he could say he was unable to or uninterested in charging Manafort with conspiracy after Manafort wouldn't cooperate with tge SCO but got more than 7 years in prison anyway. That's very different from saying that Manafort didn't actively collude with the Kremlin.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

2/ When I wrote my first book on this subject, I deliberately stuck with the term "collusion." To say collusion simply means "conspiracy" is not only wrong—it does enormous damage to our understanding of what actually happened here and why it's the biggest scandal in our history.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

3/ I've seen non-attorney journalists foolishly boast that they're smarter than most for having figured out that "collusion" is the wrong term to use here—that we should opt for "conspiracy." But when you use the narrowest and hardest-to-prove term for misconduct, you excuse it.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

4/ The result of so many people not understanding the difference between conspiracy and collusion and the *greater* utility of the *latter* term is we have all these Trumper morons on Twitter saying Mueller found no collusion when what they *mean* is he'll *charge* no conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

5/ Collusion can occur without criminal conduct. Collusion can occur within criminal conduct not charged as conspiracy. Collusion can be assigned to a campaign, not just—as crimes are—one person. Journalists must say Mueller is likely to find collusion, but not charge conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

6/ I'll admit that I'm angry—and have been for some time—at those journalists who've thought so little about the norms we're trying to protect here that they've accepted the Trumper line that everything is *okay* so long as Mueller didn't find 90%+ proof of a criminal conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

7/ When Trump had a secret face-to-face conversation with Putin, then hours later crafted a false statement for America to read about a meeting with Kremlin agents in his home—to keep hiding what he's always hidden, the scope of his relationship with the Kremlin—that's collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

8/ When Trump held a national security meeting in his hotel in March 2016 and a member of his tiny NatSec team said he was a Kremlin intermediary trying to set up—backchannel—a secret Trump-Russia summit on foreign policy with the Kremlin and Trump promoted him, that's collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

9/ When Trump—knowing perfectly well that his campaign was engaged in a backchannel conversation with the Kremlin over its support for him—publicly asked for the Kremlin's help in hacking his opponents, and in under 24 hours the hackers acceded to his wishes, that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

10/ When Trump directly ordered his NatSec team to make a change to the RNC platform to benefit the Kremlin at a time his campaign was reaching out to Kremlin agents to get them to give him stolen Clinton emails—thereby performing on his half of a quid pro quo—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

11/ When Trump "found out"—assuming he hadn't known all along—his NSA had been secretly negotiating American foreign policy with the Kremlin for months, including during the campaign, and not only didn't fire him but tried to deep-six feds' prosecution of him, that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

12/ When Trump was secretly negotiating a multibillion dollar tower deal with Kremlin agents during the 2016 campaign while telling America that he had no business relationship whatsoever with any Russians, that was collusion of the most outrageously obvious and treacherous sort.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

13/ When Trump disclosed classified Israeli intel in the Oval Office at a meeting with top Kremlin agents that he'd forbidden any Americans from attending or even photographing—and bragged to them about ending investigation into secret US-Russian coordination—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

14/ When Trump secretly crafted a plan to drop all sanctions on the Kremlin even as his presidential campaign aides were having countless secret meetings with Russian nationals about sanctions policy—a plan that, when revealed, *terrified* the State Department—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

15/ Proof that I could go on and on in this vein ad nauseum is that I've written two books—about 1000 pages—on Trump's collusion. Never let journalists tell you that there shouldn't be a *word* for all this until it's "conspiracy" beyond a reasonable doubt. It's *collusion*. /end

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

Bрексита

By Anne Applebaum
Columnist [The Washington Post]
March 8 at 6:23 PM

Elements of the 2016 British referendum campaign have long seemed familiar to Americans. There was a close, controversial election, full of rancor and anger. There were a lot of wealthy men talking about “the people” and their “will.” There were targeted advertising campaigns, stolen data and fake social media accounts. But now, with only a few days left until Britain is due to face the consequences of that vote, the Brexit story suddenly looks even more familiar: One of its protagonists turns out to have much deeper Russian business connections than previously suspected. He also tried to conceal them. []

The world is now churning out #AlternativeWar as surprise news two years down the line. Depressing really. https://t.co/ahazwMQt2o

— James Patrick 🐐 (@J_amesp) March 9, 2019

 more

Leave Has More Clout in Social Media than Remain

"We've reached the point where there is no good conclusion to Brexit and Britain faces a choice: take one for the team or be willing participants in the fall of Europe. And no, you are not going to like this." – @J_amesp #Brexit #NoDealBrexithttps://t.co/TtY4OZv6Bs

— Byline (@Byline_Media) February 25, 2019

Putin’s project works well for Putin.
https://www.byline.com/column/67/article/2428:

[…] Brexit is a disease and Britain is a contagion risk which could unpick the fabric of the whole of Europe and leave millions more people facing much worse than even no deal. []

Robert Mueller Has Stitched Together a Russia Report in Plain View

Indictment by indictment, special counsel Robert Mueller has stitched together a Russia report in plain view. https://t.co/4giqodTony

— The Associated Press (@AP) February 23, 2019

 more
 

THE MEMO: Mueller report won’t end Trump’s legal woes https://t.co/bPqObe9R1Z pic.twitter.com/R11qgGogyz

— The Hill (@thehill) February 23, 2019

 more

GDPR Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner