Blog

London, 2019-03-23: Two Million Friends of Europe

Put it to the people pic.twitter.com/12Bo1VrpMu

— Led By Donkeys (@ByDonkeys) March 23, 2019

2 million friends or Europe enjoyed an early Spring Saturday in London.

 

Actually, Brian, they do. Always. For operational reasons. They used to release them, but they stopped as it was contentious. But they still give unofficial estimates privately. And they always do two calculations. The first is based on special calculations and a rule of thumb >

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

>assumed density of 3.5 people per square metre. They then, however, continue updating this estimate with a second stage calculation that looks at people still joining the back of a march and an updated density ratio based on how long a demo takes to get between two fixed points>

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

>That is why final estimates often differ. Because some matches are much more tightly packed and slow moving than others. This updated ratio can change the calculation dramatically. In this case, the 1m estimate first surfaced before the front started moving. After that point>

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

>and this is very important, the police advised the front of the march to start moving annhour earlier than they had intended, because they were experiencing “unusually high density and rate of people joining at the back” and became concerned. People continued arriving in a>

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

>regular stream for at least two more hours. And according to everyone on the march it was unusually tightly packed and slow moving. This makes the original 1m estimate, very unreliable. But having released it, I suspect, organisers did not want to update, as they would face>

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

>accusations precisely like this. 1m is a great, iconic number anyway. At the end of the march the police unofficial rough estimate to organisers was closer to 2m. Had this confirmed by two separate sources. It may be wrong, but it’s more reliable than the static 1pm figure. END

— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) March 23, 2019

 

They use software and aerial footage that basically counts a line of people and multiplies them by the volume of the location. I was told by contacts in the Met that two million was their estimate (I posted this but took it down as I can't prove my sources).

— UK4Europe #FBPE đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡ș🇬🇧 (@UK4Europe) March 24, 2019

Haunted by Kremlins

Reporting establishes that Trump's campaign manager sold a known Kremlin spy proprietary internal campaign polling data and an offer of private briefings on Trump's foreign policy deliberations for $2.4 million. We'll see what Mueller found—but it certainly wasn't "no collusion."

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

1/ For instance, he could say he was unable to or uninterested in charging Manafort with conspiracy after Manafort wouldn't cooperate with tge SCO but got more than 7 years in prison anyway. That's very different from saying that Manafort didn't actively collude with the Kremlin.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

2/ When I wrote my first book on this subject, I deliberately stuck with the term "collusion." To say collusion simply means "conspiracy" is not only wrong—it does enormous damage to our understanding of what actually happened here and why it's the biggest scandal in our history.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

3/ I've seen non-attorney journalists foolishly boast that they're smarter than most for having figured out that "collusion" is the wrong term to use here—that we should opt for "conspiracy." But when you use the narrowest and hardest-to-prove term for misconduct, you excuse it.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

4/ The result of so many people not understanding the difference between conspiracy and collusion and the *greater* utility of the *latter* term is we have all these Trumper morons on Twitter saying Mueller found no collusion when what they *mean* is he'll *charge* no conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

5/ Collusion can occur without criminal conduct. Collusion can occur within criminal conduct not charged as conspiracy. Collusion can be assigned to a campaign, not just—as crimes are—one person. Journalists must say Mueller is likely to find collusion, but not charge conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

6/ I'll admit that I'm angry—and have been for some time—at those journalists who've thought so little about the norms we're trying to protect here that they've accepted the Trumper line that everything is *okay* so long as Mueller didn't find 90%+ proof of a criminal conspiracy.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

7/ When Trump had a secret face-to-face conversation with Putin, then hours later crafted a false statement for America to read about a meeting with Kremlin agents in his home—to keep hiding what he's always hidden, the scope of his relationship with the Kremlin—that's collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

8/ When Trump held a national security meeting in his hotel in March 2016 and a member of his tiny NatSec team said he was a Kremlin intermediary trying to set up—backchannel—a secret Trump-Russia summit on foreign policy with the Kremlin and Trump promoted him, that's collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

9/ When Trump—knowing perfectly well that his campaign was engaged in a backchannel conversation with the Kremlin over its support for him—publicly asked for the Kremlin's help in hacking his opponents, and in under 24 hours the hackers acceded to his wishes, that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

10/ When Trump directly ordered his NatSec team to make a change to the RNC platform to benefit the Kremlin at a time his campaign was reaching out to Kremlin agents to get them to give him stolen Clinton emails—thereby performing on his half of a quid pro quo—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

11/ When Trump "found out"—assuming he hadn't known all along—his NSA had been secretly negotiating American foreign policy with the Kremlin for months, including during the campaign, and not only didn't fire him but tried to deep-six feds' prosecution of him, that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

12/ When Trump was secretly negotiating a multibillion dollar tower deal with Kremlin agents during the 2016 campaign while telling America that he had no business relationship whatsoever with any Russians, that was collusion of the most outrageously obvious and treacherous sort.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

13/ When Trump disclosed classified Israeli intel in the Oval Office at a meeting with top Kremlin agents that he'd forbidden any Americans from attending or even photographing—and bragged to them about ending investigation into secret US-Russian coordination—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

14/ When Trump secretly crafted a plan to drop all sanctions on the Kremlin even as his presidential campaign aides were having countless secret meetings with Russian nationals about sanctions policy—a plan that, when revealed, *terrified* the State Department—that was collusion.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

15/ Proof that I could go on and on in this vein ad nauseum is that I've written two books—about 1000 pages—on Trump's collusion. Never let journalists tell you that there shouldn't be a *word* for all this until it's "conspiracy" beyond a reasonable doubt. It's *collusion*. /end

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 24, 2019

Kushner’s Clearance and MBS

Jared Kushner has private Whatsapp chats with the Saudi crown prince.
Jared advised the prince on how to weather backlash after Jamal Khashoggi’s murder.
Jared did all of this while on an interim, downgraded, or suspiciously obtained security clearance. pic.twitter.com/OFcL27Ouep

— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) March 17, 2019

Writing this book, I see…daily… how Trump and Kushner have cost lives around the world. Kushner gave MbS classified intel that led to MbS arresting an American and having him tortured via electrocution repeatedly (he's still held—look it up). It can't help but have an effect.

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) March 16, 2019

Saudi Kidnap-and-Murder Squad Struck 12 times in 2 Years

News from Donald Trumps’s and Jared Kushner’s business friends:

Think there's no serious reporting anymore?

Article below exposes a Saudi government kidnap-and-murder squad that struck 12 times in 2 years, including murdering @washingtonpost columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Super sophisticated, very costly reporting: https://t.co/iLG6aciqaO

— David Cay Johnston (@DavidCayJ) March 17, 2019

 more

Nebelwerfer

It seems that the GOP assigned Trump to a smoke screen mortar launcher mission. His McCain noise successfully generates more McCain noise. What else is going on in the USA? Which activities does the GOP try to hide?

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) March 22, 2019

German ZDF Shows What BBC Failed to Show

A German TV reporter appears at @guardian for an interview. "You're doing a whole hour on Brexit crimes?" I say. No British broadcaster has done that. "In Germany, we think this is a v important topic. It affects the entire future of Europe. People really need to know the truth." https://t.co/jRVNMt6o56

— Carole Cadwalladr (@carolecadwalla) March 21, 2019

@DirkLaabs bring it on! You've got now many new friends in the UK! When do we finally get a debate with politicians & ordinary citizens about it as Brexit is part of a much bigger picture? @guyverhofstadt @GrahameLucas @AuroraBlogspot #FBPE @GenreResearchhttps://t.co/86olL6SmO1

— Werner Trapmann #PECS @EU27k (@WernerT_Man) March 21, 2019

One has to be logged on to YouTube to use this.
.
For those w/o a YouTube account, I uploaded the translation 👇https://t.co/EJ85neEdo0

— Nuclear Football (@EuphoricEuler) March 21, 2019

GDPR Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner