Blog

“UKIP” And “The Brexit Party Limited” Are Cooperating

UKIP and The Brexit Party Limited are cooperating!

»Vote tactically. If UKIP is likely to lead the vote share, vote for UKIP, and if The Brexit Party is more likely to lead the field in the South East – vote for the Brexit Party, we would suggest.«https://t.co/xmB0k9KarW

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) May 16, 2019

 See also: http://www.surreyheathukip.org.uk/ (archived: 2018-08-10 | 2019-05-18)

I don’t know, however, where UKIP is likely to lead the vote share.

Also interesting: Nigel Farage’s 2015 UKIP manifesto

Brexit Party Manifesto

Nigel Farage needs the Brexit to reach his political goals. At the end of this post you find links to a manifesto for which Farage is responsible.


 

»The Brexit Party leader also claimed manifestos are a “deliberate tactic” used by other parties to “get away from a proper debate” on Brexit.«

Lazy kids can come up with all kind of weird excuses for not delivering their homework 🤣https://t.co/8CHcZFIoZt

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) May 15, 2019

Nigel Farage refuses to do his homework as a leader of a party which intends to send members to the EU parliament. Because of Farage’s objectives beyond Brexit, having a debate on Brexit only is not enough. Based on what is available from this founder of company number 11694875, @Richardmassey82 helped Nigel Farage to get Farage’s homework done.: Richard compiled a brief version of the manifesto of The Brexit Party Limited.

The primary objective of The Brexit Party Limited is Brexit. But to Farage (“Occupation: Leader Of A Political Party”), Brexit of course has a purpose. To him, Brexit is a means to pursue the following objectives (besides his personal financial interests) without interference from the EU:

  1. Bring back handguns after kneejerk ban after children killed in Dunblane.
  2. Scrap the NHS.
  3. Scrap maternity pay for all women in small businesses.
  4. Bring back corporal punishment in schools.
  5. Ban the building of mosques.
  6. Reduce foreign players in English football.
  7. Root out Jewish influence in government.

This is why you need to understand why Farage wants to hide the manifesto of The Brexit Party Limited.

Details:

The Brexit Party don't do Manifestos. But if they did they would be the most worrying manifesto in the world.

Election pledge 1 – bring back handguns after kneejerk ban after children killed in Dunblane pic.twitter.com/p5Ottdlhrb

— Richard #peoplesvote (@Richardmassey82) May 13, 2019

Election pledge 2 – Scrap the NHS pic.twitter.com/28Y5D87NAj

— Richard #peoplesvote (@Richardmassey82) May 13, 2019

Pledge 3 – Scrap maternity pay for all women in small businesses pic.twitter.com/wDAKgfsuwH

— Richard #peoplesvote (@Richardmassey82) May 13, 2019

Pledge 4,5 and 6

Bring back corporal punishment in schools

Ban the building of mosques

Reduce foreign players in English football pic.twitter.com/sirLIcnnpQ

— Richard #peoplesvote (@Richardmassey82) May 13, 2019

Pledge 7 -root out Jewish influence in government pic.twitter.com/wCN6if3yxf

— Richard #peoplesvote (@Richardmassey82) May 13, 2019


 


Nigel Farage‘s objectives didn’t change: Take control back from EU so that he and his financiers have better control over their business environment in the UK. This is why he founded the company The Brexit Party Limited. Below you find Farage’s 2010 manifestos and more:

(There also is a separate page for these links.)
 

That was in 2014. Now Farage plays a similar game in 2019. He plays the system.

The 2010 UKIP manifesto still can be found in the Internet. In https://t.co/RyrCeaa4Kj you'll find some links.

And I think that UKIP cooperates with The Brexit Party Ltd.: https://t.co/lUw3qW7acn

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) May 16, 2019

Trump Builds on Obama’s Work

Anyone who believes Trump is responsible for this economy must also believe roosters are responsible for sunrises. pic.twitter.com/dILK0PCvWY

— Robert Reich (@RBReich) May 5, 2019

POTUS changed his talking point. The job-growth trend, not so much. pic.twitter.com/rxAgQR0BZJ

— Aaron Sojourner (@aaronsojourner) May 5, 2019

This is the typical result of @GOP control. They throw average Americans under the bus to boost their own wealth. There has never been, nor will there ever be, a trickle down benefit. pic.twitter.com/x9CnaljURV

— Forever Logical 🖖 (@ForeverLogical) May 6, 2019

Brexit Party Ltd.

@guyverhofstadt @eucopresident @ElectoralCommUK @EU_Commission
What's wrong with the UK? How can such a company (https://t.co/JxkFtnBEk5) participate in the EU elections? Is this a scheme to get around the rules for parties or EU elections?https://t.co/ebKouUqNfQ

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) May 5, 2019

To @Wahlleiter_Bund: Would it be possible in Germany for a company like e.g. "Dexit-Partei GmbH" without party members to compete against regular German parties in the 2019 EU election?

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) May 5, 2019


 

Ok, here’s a question @Nigel_Farage. Where did you get my mum’s name & address from? She’s not on public register. Do all campaigns now have the official register?? Or is it from your database @Arron_banks? Or yours @TBorwick? Where’s the data from?? pic.twitter.com/MhBt577TTO

— Carole Cadwalladr (@carolecadwalla) May 5, 2019

Reading the Mueller Report

Teri Kanefield‘s blog posts on Reading the Mueller Report also are available as Tweets. At the end of each blog entry there is a linksto the related thread. Go there for the comments.

 

Part I: “A Sweeping and Systematic” Attack on America
The scope and scale of the Russian cyber attack on the U.S. was breath-taking and horrifying. From Special Counsel: “The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion.” …

Part II: Links Galore
While the Russian government was busy interfering in the presidential election in “sweeping and systematic fashion,” what were members of the Trump Campaign doing? …

Part III (was IV): Why More Crimes Weren’t Charged
Why weren’t more crimes charged from the behavior described in Vol. I? First reason: Special Counsel (SC) was not able to collect all the evidence for a variety of reasons (Mueller Report, page 10)…

Part IV (was IV-2): The June 9, 2016 Trump Tower Meeting
Why weren’t crimes charged as a result of the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower Meeting? We’ll begin with the “facts.” By “facts” I mean what the prosecutors have enough evidence to prove. …

Part V: Links but no “coordination”
All those links—but no “coordination.” How can that be? Mueller’s task was to determine whether there were “links and/or coordination” between the Trump Campaign and Russia. Mueller found links galore. …

Part VI: Barr v. Mueller
I wasn’t planning to write about Barr or anything extraneous to the Mueller Report as I march through my reading and analysis. But then I read Vol II (Obstruction) pages 1-2, and I have no choice. …

Part VII: Mueller Does IRAC
Vol. II lays out the factual findings from the Mueller investigation regarding obstruction of justice. A few comments about “facts” and “evidence.” Not all evidence is admissible in court. The rules of evidence are intended to screen out unreliable evidence …

Part VIII: Sometimes Lying and Obstructing is a Crime. Sometimes it isn’t.
It’s time for some Fun With Criminal Law. (That means more IRAC) Remember, IRAC is a method of legal analysis. …

GDPR Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner