Order! Restraint! Patience! Zen!

Can we just take a moment to appreciate John Bercow’s tie 👀#BrexitVote #BrexitShambles pic.twitter.com/WXO4jdO5W5

— Antonio Ventre (@AntonioVentre13) January 15, 2019

 

Good man, beautiful necktie. Keeps order since 2009 in the House of Commons. Love it. One big loss for Europe.

Order! Order! Order! pic.twitter.com/WjvKZWGTPu

— tagesschau (@tagesschau) January 16, 2019

Democratic Double Check

It seems that Theresa May pretends to protect democracy by not offering a 2nd referendum because in reality she wants to “protect” herself from having to admit that she made several big mistakes. These mistakes would become clearly visible if a 2nd referendum would take place. To Theresa May, saving her own face is more important than the future of the United Kingdom and its citizens.

Claiming that asking people for their opinion in a 2nd referendum would do harm to democracy is utterly foolish. A 2nd referendum will be based on knowledge which was not available to the voters who participated in the 1st referendum. That’s obvious. Theresa May can think clearly and knows that. Therefore not offering a second referendum is worse than foolish. It is selfish and evil.

After May's heroic failure: Check and adjust! A 2nd referendum is more democracy and smarter democracy.

Applying the Deming Cycle (plan–do–check–act or plan–do–check–adjust, https://t.co/P1r9mHxoTV) is good governance.

The UK should do it.

The EU should do it.

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) January 16, 2019

 

Good governance requires "Double Check" (actually more: a cycle of checks): https://t.co/P1r9mHxoTV .

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) January 15, 2019

 more

 

Governments should practise good governance: https://t.co/P1r9mHxoTV

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) January 15, 2019

 more

 

@JolyonMaugham @JMPSimor @Nigel_Farage @acgrayling @OxfordDiplomat @SPD2212 @Shortbloke @abcpoppins pic.twitter.com/Ei7leXOmKP

— 🔶 Limited Ferry Sevices without a Ferry (@Wade73605662) January 14, 2019

EU Citizens in Britain

Call in question (00:00:59) of a EU citizen to Boris Johnson: “Do you regret luring people into a false sense of certainty that their EU citizens’ friends, family, neighbours will be secure in the case of Brexit?”

This morning @antoni_UK got a chance to ask @BorisJohnson a question that all of us EU citizens ask ourselves often: whether he regrets that, during the #EUref, he lured people into a false sense of certainty re: the rights of EU citizens. Johnson’s answer is shocking. 1/ pic.twitter.com/E4B3uNuJyD

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

Shocking? It’s Boris Johnson. The answer was evasive.
What else can one expect?

❌ It’s not automatic.
❌ It’s an application.
❌ It takes rights away from us.
❌ Applications can be rejected.
❌ If unsuccessful deportation is a possibility.
❌ If successful it gives us special ID numbers on a special register only for EU citizens for special checks. 3/

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

So for @BorisJohnson to simply say he doesn’t “agree” with @antoni_UK ... doesn’t see that there is a difference, and claims all will be fine ... Well, Mr Johnson: the facts are crystal clear and they tell a very different story. 4/

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

Those facts include your own voting record on protecting the rights of us EU citizens. What made you vote for protecting them as a one-off right after the #EUref, to them consistently vote against the protection of our rights @BorisJohnson? 5/ pic.twitter.com/yjqQKOY5p8

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

In any case the points @BorisJohnson made in his reply are simply wrong. That’s it. As we know from an FOI request about #SettledStatus, the Home Office does plan to use it for immigration control, so there can be no doubt anymore that the aim is to control who of us can stay. 6/

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

So yes @BorisJohnson: you did lure people into a false sense of certainty about what would happen to their EU citizen neighbours, colleagues, friends and family. You also did that to us directly. Your answer simply isn’t good enough and in no way acceptable. Own your Brexit. 7/

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

So I second the concerns and questions @antoni_UK set out in his letter to you following the show this morning. https://t.co/yPXaWUwCOi 8/8

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) January 14, 2019

(You also may want to try https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1084857433577664520.html. However, at least when I tried to use it, some images were not displayed.)

GDPR Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner