Blog

D-Day

And yes, I’ve seen the shitrag spread for tomorrow. But I’m not sure whether I’m more angry about the ahistorical D-Day crap it seeks to invoke, or the completely twisted nonsense about settled status and the fee that it covers next to that. pic.twitter.com/4pSUYFASrL

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) February 2, 2019


 

Bollocks! There will be no election on the 6th June. After her 2017 performance the Tories wouldn’t let May take the risk. This story is designed to scare the shit out of MP colleagues in Leave seats in the hope they will vote for Mays deal. Let’s hope they can see through it. https://t.co/bJfS2gWWgs

— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) February 3, 2019

Good Answers
to a Whining Brexiteer

Marshall Plan assistance by country. https://t.co/9C7XNpfqfm pic.twitter.com/ysCksb90nU

— Property Spotter (@PropertySpot) February 2, 2019


Daniel Kawczynski shows that Fintan O’Toole is right.
 

There is more:

It’s really enough now. Every single day for almost a month there’s been some anti-German snipe. Usually not based on facts. I have really had enough of this. As a German but also as a historian. The abuse of history to justify Brexit is sickening, irresponsible and dangerous. 1/ https://t.co/TGLuXg5lEB

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) February 2, 2019

The UK actually got the biggest share of funding from the Marshall Plan. Next was France and only then came Germany. Shame on you @DKShrewsbury for spouting such nonsense. Even the BBC website could have told you the real story. But clearly you were intent on 2/ pic.twitter.com/vn76ra57ty

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) February 2, 2019

whistling for the dogs … If you think others don’t see this, if you think this will just go unnoticed, think again. UK politicians are burning bridges that took decades to build with just one tweet. It’s a tragedy. 3/3

— Prof Tanja Bueltmann (@cliodiaspora) February 2, 2019


 

And:

This is a false statement by a UK MP, and he knows it is false, but he does not care.

UK benefited significantly from Marshall Plan.

That a MP can assert this falsehood, and for it to be RTd so heavily, tells of what is wrong with UK politics.

This is dishonesty at UK's core. https://t.co/OdykYz8p31

— David Allen Green (@davidallengreen) February 3, 2019

Trump and Bible Literacy

Trump and literacy already is an interesting issue. At least he fosters Bible literacy.

Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 28, 2019

For Anyone who is wondering why he is randomly tweeting about the Bible,

— It's because his support from Evangelicals is slipping in the Polls!

He went from 73% Approval 17 Disapproval last year to

66% Approval 23% Disapproval this year! (NPR Marist)https://t.co/LfGA0OxhIH

— Ryan Hill (@RyanHillMI) January 28, 2019

“Impact of These Actions
on Vulnerable Children”

As far as I understand, Pence subscribes to Christian values. And Trump promotes bible literacy. But as for what they knowingly tolerate, both are evil nevertheless.

There are real solutions to finding the parents. The WH does not care and are not interested in resolving the problem which they created. Are they to incarcerate these children forever? What are they doing with them? What is their plan?

— KMBHOL (@Kboyk) February 2, 2019

 

  • Separated Children Placed in Office of Refugee Resettlement Care (U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, Office of Inspector General, 2019-01-17)

    Why OIG Did This Review
            In the spring of 2018, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) implemented a “zero-tolerance policy” for certain immigration offenses. As a result, DHS separated large numbers of alien families, with adults being held in Federal detention while their children were transferred to the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
            On June 26, 2018, in a class action lawsuit, Ms. L v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a Federal District Courtordered the Federal Government to identify and reunify separated families who met certain criteria.
            Given the potential impact of these actions on vulnerable children and ORR operations, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted this review to determine the number and status of separated children (i.e., children separated from their parent or legal guardian by DHS) who have entered ORR care, including but not limited to the subset of separated children covered by Ms. L v. ICE. In a separate review, OIG is examining challenges that ORR-funded facilities have faced in reunifying separated children. On the basis of those findings, OIG plans to recommend solutions to improve ORR program operations.

  • Family Separation May Have Hit Thousands More Migrant Children Than Reported (New York Times, 2019-01-17)

    “This report confirms what we suspected: This cruel family separation practice was way bigger than the administration let on,” said Lee Gelernt, who challenged the policy in court on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union. “We will be back in court and ask the judge to order the government to explain these numbers,” he said.

  • Family Separation by the Numbers (ACLU, 2018-10-23)

    ※ How long have they been separated from their parents?
    For the children still in ORR care awaiting reunification, the median length of detention so far is 154 days — more than five months. Some have been in detention as long as a year. For example, one four-year-old child, “Luna,” was separated from her father for nearly 10 months before they were reunified in Guatemala on Sept. 28. This figure excludes separations where the child and the parent have decided to waive their right to reunification.
    ※ What was their age and gender?
    Of the initial pool of 2,654 separated children, the majority was male (64.5 percent). 1,033 of them were under the age of ten when they were detained, including 103 under five. The data furnished by the government shows a sharp drop off in the number of separated children between five and four years old.

 

The president and his Christian vice president need to study some Christian values. How could they have tolerated that almost 3000 children had been seperated from their parents (https://t.co/PKlYtwxUud) without the documentation required for reuniting them?

— Goetz Kluge (@Bonnetmaker) February 3, 2019

OMG

Sarah Sanders on CBN: "“I think God calls all of us to fill different roles at different times and I think that he wanted Donald Trump to become president."

— Alan Rappeport (@arappeport) January 30, 2019

 more
 

Sarah Sanders says God wanted Trump to be president. This raises a thorny theological question: Why did God let Hillary Clinton win the popular vote? https://t.co/aPGWjXYZ1I

— Dana Milbank (@Milbank) February 1, 2019

 more

#Cult45

GDPR Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner